<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How old was King Solomon when his daughters Taphath and Basemath were born?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://BibleQ.info/answer/1711/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://BibleQ.info/answer/1711/</link>
	<description>Bible Questions Answered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 03:08:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Day</title>
		<link>http://BibleQ.info/answer/1711/comment-page-1/#comment-322</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Day</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 10:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://BibleQ.info/?p=1711#comment-322</guid>
		<description>Hi Rob thanks for your answer. It seems reasonable to me.
 Sorry about confusing the wives with concubines - some men have a low sperm count and perhaps spread himself to widely - but I take it you agree that he had few children, posibly only the 3 mention in scripture. I have often heard people assume that he a multitude of kids - I do not think we can assume that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rob thanks for your answer. It seems reasonable to me.<br />
 Sorry about confusing the wives with concubines &#8211; some men have a low sperm count and perhaps spread himself to widely &#8211; but I take it you agree that he had few children, posibly only the 3 mention in scripture. I have often heard people assume that he a multitude of kids &#8211; I do not think we can assume that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob J Hyndman</title>
		<link>http://BibleQ.info/answer/1711/comment-page-1/#comment-320</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob J Hyndman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 04:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://BibleQ.info/?p=1711#comment-320</guid>
		<description>Actually, it was 700 wives and 300 concubines (1 Kings 11:3). I don&#039;t know of any further information about his children, or his ability to produce them. But presumably, with 1000 sexual partners, he was likely to contract a sexually transmitted disease, and that may have prevented further children.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, it was 700 wives and 300 concubines (1 Kings 11:3). I don&#8217;t know of any further information about his children, or his ability to produce them. But presumably, with 1000 sexual partners, he was likely to contract a sexually transmitted disease, and that may have prevented further children.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Day</title>
		<link>http://BibleQ.info/answer/1711/comment-page-1/#comment-319</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Day</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 00:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://BibleQ.info/?p=1711#comment-319</guid>
		<description>300 wives and 700 concubines - and only 3 recorded children - no allusions to other siblings and since Rehoboam had no brothers challenging his throne, it would seem that 3 was Solomon&#039;s lot.  I imagine there was a bit of palace gossip about his virility.
Is there anything anywhere to substantiate either the number of his children or his virility?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>300 wives and 700 concubines &#8211; and only 3 recorded children &#8211; no allusions to other siblings and since Rehoboam had no brothers challenging his throne, it would seem that 3 was Solomon&#8217;s lot.  I imagine there was a bit of palace gossip about his virility.<br />
Is there anything anywhere to substantiate either the number of his children or his virility?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

